regulations such as the Bretton Woods agreement of 1944 which bounded the dollar with gold. So much that just by 1971 for the first time in the 21st century the United states experienced a merchandise trade deficit which means it imported more than it exported.When Carter took office he had a tough job trying to secure a declining economy. Carter viewed inflation not unemployment as the counties main economic problem and to combat it he promoted cuts in spending on domestic programs. When Reagan came into office his proposed solution to the economy came to be known as Reaganomics. Economic freedom for Reagan meant curtailing the power of unions, dismantling regulations, and radically reducing taxes. Reagan had declared that taxation violated the principle that "the right to earn your own keep and keep what you earn". Reagan supply side economics initially produced the most severe recession since the 1930s but soon after an expansion took charge till 1981.
Telling us the only true winner is us but that is most likely not true as Los Angles times writer David Lazarus says "
with repeated offenses. This creates a never ending cycle of more prisoners and more free labor. Plus the prison system employes many people witch gives jobs to many who with out that prison in their area would not have a job.
An area that has also left America wondering is their truly equality is the large amounts of pay CEOs of big corporations get paid. They are now earning up to 300 times the amount the normal worker gets payed. The worst part is that if the company gets bad press over something or starts loosing money and decided to let the CEO go they get a "reward" for their bad job. They call them termination benefits but why do we reward these people with failure on top of their high paying job. Well its all for the companies sake so the CEO wont try to sue them it sort of a getting payed to forget whatever happened here and u can just leave us your problem and we will handle it now. This is truly seen in companies that are classified as "to big to fail". These companies had to be bailed out during the recession because they were seen a s to big and their failure would cause an enormously bad impact on the economy and spiral out of control with one bank taking the nest in a domino effect. When these companies especial banks made bad mistakes and bad investments but they still get bailed out and hard working Americans who worked hard were not even helped. If true capitalism would have stayed in course most of those businesses would not be here today and new ones would have taken their place , probobly in a slow very hard to way but at least we would not be going into more debt just to bail out these greedy companies that only care about profits. I think if this trend like this continuous there will need to be a change to protect the consumer and accountability in the companies actions. Sure they don't want higher regulation to make sure they don't do bad investments but they sure will except money from the government when they are about to go down and under.